<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Games You Should Have Played in 2009, But Probably Didn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/</link>
	<description>A Guide To Everything Geek In The City Of Brotherly Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 3 Games You Should Have Played in 2010, But Didn&#8217;t &#171; Geekadelphia</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/comment-page-1/#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 3 Games You Should Have Played in 2010, But Didn&#8217;t &#171; Geekadelphia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=10702#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>[...] year I wrote one of these roundups, highlighting the best games in 2009 that no one played. Wolfenstein, Wet, and other titles that largely went ignored got their just due, and this year, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year I wrote one of these roundups, highlighting the best games in 2009 that no one played. Wolfenstein, Wet, and other titles that largely went ignored got their just due, and this year, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6833</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=10702#comment-6833</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t realize Grin did Wanted and Terminator.  I thought they were both decent games.  I&#039;m not sure why people hated Terminator so much, the cover system was good, a lot of fun to play in coop and the firefights required some degree of flanking and strategy rather than just mindless shooting.  No boss fights was pretty horrible though.   That being said, charging 60 dollars for games that can be beaten in literally 3 hours is insulting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize Grin did Wanted and Terminator.  I thought they were both decent games.  I&#8217;m not sure why people hated Terminator so much, the cover system was good, a lot of fun to play in coop and the firefights required some degree of flanking and strategy rather than just mindless shooting.  No boss fights was pretty horrible though.   That being said, charging 60 dollars for games that can be beaten in literally 3 hours is insulting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infinite Lives &#187; Daily Linksplosion: Tuesday, December 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6784</link>
		<dc:creator>Infinite Lives &#187; Daily Linksplosion: Tuesday, December 29, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=10702#comment-6784</guid>
		<description>[...] Geekadelphia &#8211; Top 5 Games You Should Have Played in 2009, But Probably Didn’t(Unless you did, but I didn&#8217;t actually play &#8216;Wet.&#8217;)GameSetWatch &#8211; Soviet Arcade Game Posters!Newgrounds &#8211; Tuper Tario Tros.This is one of those hard-as-balls games that makes you feel like maybe you&#8217;re totally brilliant.Acid for Blood &#8211; Dragon Age: Origins, Sexual Orientation, and Player ChoiceStraight gets two potential romantic partners, bi gets you three, gay gets you one.Follow us on Delicious! &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geekadelphia &#8211; Top 5 Games You Should Have Played in 2009, But Probably Didn’t(Unless you did, but I didn&#8217;t actually play &#8216;Wet.&#8217;)GameSetWatch &#8211; Soviet Arcade Game Posters!Newgrounds &#8211; Tuper Tario Tros.This is one of those hard-as-balls games that makes you feel like maybe you&#8217;re totally brilliant.Acid for Blood &#8211; Dragon Age: Origins, Sexual Orientation, and Player ChoiceStraight gets two potential romantic partners, bi gets you three, gay gets you one.Follow us on Delicious! &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PASTRIES</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6783</link>
		<dc:creator>PASTRIES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=10702#comment-6783</guid>
		<description>I thought Wet was kind of embarrassing... sloppy controls, transparent level design, huge doses of cinema envy... it was all style, no substance, and the style wasn&#039;t even interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Wet was kind of embarrassing&#8230; sloppy controls, transparent level design, huge doses of cinema envy&#8230; it was all style, no substance, and the style wasn&#8217;t even interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Jack</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/12/29/top-5-games-you-should-have-played-in-2009-but-probably-didnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=10702#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>Well, I really was looking forward to Wet, but it was so glitchy for me that it was practically unplayable. Another great idea but poor execution, but still worth the rental. Can&#039;t really agree with anything else except Torchlight, since Wolfenstein and BC kinda sucked. Splosion Man should probably be recommended. I would also recommend Eat Lead: The Return Of Matt Hazard for its mix of video game cliches and humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I really was looking forward to Wet, but it was so glitchy for me that it was practically unplayable. Another great idea but poor execution, but still worth the rental. Can&#8217;t really agree with anything else except Torchlight, since Wolfenstein and BC kinda sucked. Splosion Man should probably be recommended. I would also recommend Eat Lead: The Return Of Matt Hazard for its mix of video game cliches and humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

