<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Pie Chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekadelphia.com/2009/06/17/enterprise-pie-chart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/06/17/enterprise-pie-chart/</link>
	<description>A Guide To Everything Geek In The City Of Brotherly Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leyton Jay</title>
		<link>http://geekadelphia.com/2009/06/17/enterprise-pie-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-14540</link>
		<dc:creator>Leyton Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekadelphia.com/?p=6853#comment-14540</guid>
		<description>Only 50% for &quot;it was actually good.&quot; - Pah!

Obama loves Star Trek? Does he?

To be honest I thought a lot of the recipe was the lack of &quot;over-sciencing&quot; and the continuous, almost exhausting action! I am a science geek and I loved the later Star Trek series for their treknobabble which I actually understood. 

But I understand it turns a lot of people off, the new Trek with laymen-speak instead of geek-speak is much more approachable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 50% for &#8220;it was actually good.&#8221; &#8211; Pah!</p>
<p>Obama loves Star Trek? Does he?</p>
<p>To be honest I thought a lot of the recipe was the lack of &#8220;over-sciencing&#8221; and the continuous, almost exhausting action! I am a science geek and I loved the later Star Trek series for their treknobabble which I actually understood. </p>
<p>But I understand it turns a lot of people off, the new Trek with laymen-speak instead of geek-speak is much more approachable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

